You are here
Species
Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link
IUCN
NCBI
EOL Text
Cytisus scoparius (Broom; syn. Sarothamnus scoparius) is a species in the pea family Fabaceae. It is native to much of Europe, from the British Isles east to southern Scandinavia, south to Iberia, and east to Belarus and Romania. Further northeast, its range is limited by its lack of tolerance of severe winter cold, with temperatures below around -25° to -30°C killing the stems. It is a woody shrub with green photosynthetic shoots, and small caducous leaves present only in spring and early summer. The leaves are simple or trifoliate, 5-15 mm long. Young shoots remain green for several years, silky-hairy at first, and have up to five small longitudinal ridges. Older stems have finely flaky to stringy grey-brown bark. The flowers are bright yellow, 1-2 cm long in bud opening to 2-3 cm long, with the typical pea flower structure; they are produced in mid spring to early summer and are pollinated by bees. The seeds are 3-4 mm diameter, produced in a 2-5 cm long pod, green ripening black. Seed dispersal starts with explosive pod splitting in hot sunny weather, and is continued further by ants, which feed on the small fleshy peduncle at the base of the seed. The seeds are long-persistent in the soil (up to 20-30 years); this can enable the species to survive periodic bush fires, and also to survive in colder regions of northeastern Europe (southern Scandinavia, Poland, etc.) where periodical severe winters may kill the entire adult population.
There are two subspecies, which differ mainly in growth habit:
* Cytisus scoparius subsp. scoparius (Common Broom). An erect shrub, growing to 2-3 metres (rarely 4 m) tall; shoots thinly hairy at first, soon becoming glabrous. This is the common form, occuring throught most of the species range.
* Cytisus scoparius subsp. maritimus (Rouy) Heywood (Prostrate Broom). A prostrate, ground-hugging shrub, not exceeding half a metre in height; shoots densely silky-hairy. It is restricted to the Atlantic coasts of southern Ireland, west Wales, southwestern England, and northwestern France.
Broom (primarily subsp. scoparius) is widely cultivated as a garden plant, and for wildlife benefit. The Andreanus Group cultivars are particularly popular, selected for their bright orange-red to pink flowers. It is also naturalised, and sometimes an invasive weed species, in parts of Australia, New Zealand, India, and North America.
The English name derives from its historical use in the manufacture of brooms, as the harvested twigs retain a degree of flexibility in use without becoming brittle. A number of other English names, some of them offensive, have been applied to the species outside of its native range.
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
Rights holder/Author | Michаel Frаnkis, Michаel Frаnkis |
Source | No source database. |
More info for the terms: density, direct effects of fire, fire intensity, fire severity, prescribed burn, prescribed fire, resistance, severity, wildfire
The direct effects of fire on Scotch broom depend on fire severity. A study in Australia indicates that wildfire caused complete mortality in Scotch broom on 2 of 3 sites. The site judged to have experienced the lowest-severity burn was the only site where postfire sprouting of Scotch broom (from 3% of burned stumps) was observed [36].
Several reports indicate responses ranging from increased germination to mortality of Scotch broom seeds following heat treatments of increasing temperatures in the laboratory [14,107,121,130]. Field observations of Scotch broom seedling emergence following fire [17,85,97,110,138] support the contention that germination of Scotch broom seed is stimulated by heat from fire. Portuguese broom seeds also had increased germination rates following heat treatments [53].
Scotch broom seeds were heated in an oven at 150, 212, 300, and 390 °F (65, 100, 150, and 200 °C) for 1 to 2 minutes to simulate temperatures and durations measured at about 1 inch (2 cm) below the soil surface during a prescribed burn at El Dorado National Forest (Bossard unpublished, cited in [14]). Temperatures at or above 300 °F (150°C) for 2 minutes killed Scotch broom seed. Temperatures of 212 °F (100 °C) or more for 1 minute increased seed susceptibility to fungal pathogens; and temperatures of 150 °F (65 °C) for 2 minutes significantly (P<0.05) increased germination and did not decrease fungal resistance [14]. Scotch broom seeds, collected in France from plants that had been subjected to fire and had recovered, were heated in an oven to a range of temperatures from 120 to 300 °F (50-150 °C) and a range of exposure times from 1 to 15 minutes. No germination was observed at temperatures of 270 °F (130 °C) or higher when the exposure time was 5 minutes or more. However, moderate heat treatments at 160 and 212 °F (70 and 100 °C) significantly increased the rate of germination relative to controls. Scotch broom had higher germination rates following 5-minute exposure to 212 °F (100 °C) and 1 minute exposure to 270 °F (130 °C) than after mechanical scarification [130]. Similarly, tests on Portuguese broom seed collected in 1994 from a population in southern Spain that was last affected by fire in August 1970, were tested at treatment temperatures of 190, 250, 300 °F (90, 120, and 150 °C) for 1, 5, and 10 minute durations; and 120 °F (50 °C) for 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes and 160 °F (70 °C) for 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes. Heating at 190 °F (90 °C) for 5 and 10 minutes enhanced germination in Portuguese broom. Additionally, of the 7 legume species tested, Portuguese broom had the highest heat resistance with 76 + 8.48% germination after heating at 250 °F (120 °C) for 10 minutes, and 2% germination after heating at 300 °F (150 °C) for 10 minutes. Mechanical scarification and hot water treatment also significantly (p<0.05) increased germination rates of Portuguese broom seeds over those of untreated controls. Seeds treated at 120 and 160 °F (50 and 70°C) at all durations, and at 190 and 250 °F (90 and 120 °C) for 1 minute did not have germination rates significantly different from controls [53].
In another laboratory study, Oregon white oak and Scotch broom were planted together in 1) pots containing soil that had been heated to 140 °F (60 °C) for 10 minutes before planting; 2) pots with about 1 inch (2 cm) of ash added to the top of the potted soils; and 3) control pots with no treatment. Scotch broom stem count was significantly (p<0.001) less than the control with the addition of ash and significantly greater than the control in heated soil. Heating the soil and adding ash significantly increased the mean stem count of Scotch broom above the control but was both significantly greater than the ash treatment alone, and significantly less than the heat treatment alone. Results suggest that the heat generated by prescribed burning would likely increase germination of Scotch broom, and that ash would reduce germination of all seedlings tested, but would have the least effect on Scotch broom [106,107]. Stem densities per pot were [106]:
All species* | Scotch broom | |
Ash | 8.5 | 4.0 |
No ash | 49.5 | 10.5 |
Heat | 33.5 | 11.0 |
No heat | 49.5 | 3.5 |
* Stem density of all species includes Scotch broom and other oak-
competitor plants (not oak seedlings)
Field studies support the contention that heat from low- to moderate-severity fire stimulates germination in Scotch broom seeds in the soil seed bank. Robertson and others [110] recorded seedling emergence for 3 years after a prescribed fire in subalpine snowgum (Eucalyptus pauciflora) woodland in Australia. They found 60 to 280 seedlings per 100 m² in burned plots 12 months after burning, and no seedling emergence in unburned plots. There was almost no seedling emergence in either burned or unburned plots 2 and 3 years after burning [110].
A comparison of postfire seed banks and seedling densities at 3 sites in Australia showed reductions in seed bank density after fire. A correspondence between fire intensity (generally, height of crown scorch) and soil seed bank reduction was not consistently observed [36]:
Site | Burn condition | Time since fire (months) | Viable seeds/m² in seed bank | Seed bank reduction as % of prefire seed bank | Total seedlings/m² | Seedlings as % of prefire seed bank |
Majors Creek | Unburned | 6 | 28,377 | n/a | 6,620 | 19 |
12 | 18,814 | n/a | 61 | 0.4 | ||
Low intensity | 6 | 1,862 | 93 | 699 | 27 | |
Medium intensity | 6 | 699 | 97 | 626 | 47 | |
High intensity | 6 | 3,117 | 89 | 692 | 18 | |
12 | 688 | 98 | 484 | 13 | ||
Barrington Tops | Prefire | -4 | 1,756 | n/a | ---- | ---- |
Prefire | -2 | 1,117 | n/a | ---- | ---- | |
Very low intensity | 12 | 482 | 57 | 103 | 18 | |
'The Lanes' | Control burn | 21 | 2,482 | ---- | 1,486 | 37 |
Low intensity* | 58 | 1,470 | ---- | 261 | 15 |
*data from [110]
Some postfire seed bank depletion can be attributed to germination, and on 2 of 3 burned sites, seedling density was proportionately higher in burned plots than in unburned plots 6 months after fire, suggesting that seeds may be scarified by fire. Seedling density was not higher after fire on the high severity site [36].
Variation in seed bank depletion following fire is influenced by several factors, including the initial size of the Scotch broom seed bank relative to that of native species, as well as interactions of fire severity and soil moisture content and their effect on heat penetration into the soil and duration of heating. Soil temperatures during fire do not exceed 212 °F (100 °C) until soil water is vaporized, while fire over dry soil can produce temperatures of several hundred °C in the top few centimeters of soil, where the majority of broom seeds are present. Soil moisture was very low when the wildfire burned at Majors Creek, whereas fires conducted at 'The Lanes' were conducted the day following rain. During 10 years of using fire to control Scotch broom at Barrington Tops, it was concluded that Scotch broom reduction would be maximized during the hottest, driest months ([36] and references therein).
These results suggest that broom seeds are adapted to postfire germination. Thus, prescribed burning in areas infested with broom could increase germination and decrease seed bank density at the soil surface, depending on duration of temperatures reached during the fire. Changes in soil temperature could also play a key role in the flush of new germinating seeds when established plants are removed. Increased solar radiation could heat the soil and stimulate seed germination [34].
More info for the term: resistance
Information gleaned from literature reviews indicates that Scotch broom has been used as a substitute for hops, capers, and coffee, for tanning, and as a source of yellow dye. It has been used for medicinal purposes such as treatment of cardiac arrhythmia, as a diruetic, emetic, and purgative, as a cure for dropsy and respiratory problems, and to induce abortions. Branches were made into brooms and used for thatching, and the bark stripped to make rope [88].
Boom species are still widely sold as ornamentals in North America and Australia [59], and apparently harvested for ornamental floral greens in some Inland Pacific Northwest forests [113].
Scotch broom has been used to stabilize sand dunes and to bind soil in road cuttings [88,97]. Scotch broom was recommended as recently as 1979 for revegetation of exposed coastal sites in North America due to its ability to fix nitrogen and its resistance to toxic salt spray [135]. Although broom is considered a forestry pest in India, it has also been used in that country as a nurse crop for commercial trees [59].
"Well-branched shrub; branches 5-angled. Leaves 3-foliolate at base, simple above, subsessile, adpressed-pubescent; leaflets elliptic-oblong to obovate, 18 x 4 mm. Flower axillary, solitary, 3 x 2 cm; pedicel 1 cm, glabrous. Calyx glabrous, half as long as pedicel; lobes 5 mm, abaxial lobe 2-toothed. Corolla bright yellow, shortly clawed; standard 2 x 2 cm; wings and keels 2 x 1 cm. Stamens 10, monadelphous; sheath 1 cm; 6 stamens longer, 4 shorter. Ovary 1 cm, densely white pubescent with elongate hairs; style 2 cm, curved. Pod to 3.5 x 0.8 cm, black, hairy along sutures."
More info for the term: high-severity fire
As of this writing (2005) there is no fire-related information available in the literature for Portuguese broom. All of the information presented here comes from research on Scotch broom. Because of their similar reproductive biology and ecology, it might be assumed that Portuguese broom will have a similar relationship to fire as Scotch broom, but more research is needed to test this assumption. Also see French broom in FEIS for more information from fire studies on this closely related species.
Fire top-kills Scotch broom, and high-severity fire causes complete mortality. Fire also causes some mortality in the soil seed bank [36]. However, field and laboratory studies indicate that heat from fires may either kill or scarify broom seed depending on temperatures reached and duration of heating (see details below).
More info for the terms: cover, forbs, shrubs
Mule deer, elk, and black-tailed jackrabbits were observed browsing on Scotch broom at 2 California sites (mule deer and elk at one site, mule deer and black-tailed jackrabbits at the other) [13,16]. On a prairie site among redwood forest habitat, mountain quail, blue grouse, and harvest mice are known to eat Scotch broom seed [11]. Scotch broom seeds were also eaten by mountain quail in the southwestern Cascade Range of Oregon [101].
Scotch broom supports a rich insect fauna in England where it is native. Prior to introduction of insects for biological control of Scotch broom, a survey of insect fauna on Scotch broom at several sites in California and British Columbia found relatively fewer total insects, less diversity of species, and a total absence of seed and pod insects compared with Scotch broom in England. Larger numbers of 2 species were found on some sites. Observations suggest that this may be due to lack of herbivory of brooms in North America [148]. Even after the introduction of biological control agents, no substantial vertebrate or invertebrate herbivory was found at any life stage of a California foothills population; however, vertebrate herbivory significantly (p<0.05) decreased biomass of Scotch broom on a northern coastal site [13].
Several species of ant eat elaiosomes of Scotch broom seed, and thus aid in seed dispersal, with varying numbers and species at different sites [11].
Palatability/nutritional value: A review from Australia suggests that Scotch broom seeds and mature shoots are unpalatable and even toxic to ungulates. Shoots are not used for forage except by rabbits in the seedling stage [88]. The source of this information is not given. A field experiment in New Zealand found that broom was moderately preferred by domestic goats and sheep in comparison to 5 other leguminous shrubs and forbs, 3 nonleguminous species, and 2 grasses [80].
An examination of the chemical composition of various browse species in New Zealand indicates that Scotch broom has high potential as a browse species for domestic goats and sheep. Nitrogen and element concentrations in leaf and stem material are presented here [66]:
Plant part | N* | P | K | S | Ca | Mg | Na | Cu | Fe | Mn | Zn | Si |
leaf | 3.9 | 0.16 | 1.1 | 0.19 | 0.49 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 23.3 | 181 | 581 | 54 | 5.2 |
stem | 2.0 | 0.11 | 1.1 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 10.0 | 96 | 131 | 42 | 15.1 |
*Units are % dry matter for macro-elements (N, P, K, S, Ca, Mg, Na) and mg/kg dry matter for micro-elements
Researchers in Spain indicate that Scotch broom may represent a high quality food source for grazing ruminants, particularly during the dry season. Chemical composition (g/kg dry matter) of leaves, stems, flowers, and fruits of Scotch broom at different maturity stages are presented below. Plant material was collected from upland sites in northwest Spain [5].
Plant part | Collection date | Organic matter | Crude protein | Neutral-detergent fiber | Acid-detergent fiber | Acid-detergent lignin | Acetyl bromide ligninª | Ether extract |
Leaves | 19 May | 944 | 277 | 220 | 150 | 28 | 84 | 7 |
10 June | 940 | 290 | 228 | 154 | 40 | 108 | 7 | |
9 July | 946 | 221 | 280 | 147 | 53 | 143 | 8 | |
10 Aug | 940 | 164 | 299 | 157 | 58 | 147 | 16 | |
15 Sept | 944 | 171 | 288 | 145 | 54 | 133 | 13 | |
Stems | 19 May | 942 | 242 | 267 | 159 | 39 | 86 | 7 |
10 June | 951 | 214 | 436 | 273 | 59 | 90 | 9 | |
9 July | 968 | 191 | 487 | 324 | 98 | 121 | 18 | |
10 Aug | 976 | 159 | 583 | 424 | 150 | 126 | 16 | |
15 Sept | 979 | 145 | 561 | 375 | 133 | 125 | 17 | |
22 Oct | 981 | 139 | 519 | 324 | 126 | 116 | 19 | |
26 Nov | 980 | 156 | 473 | 337 | 139 | 138 | 23 | |
Flowers | 19 May | 956 | 216 | 257 | 157 | 58 | 83 | 30 |
Fruits | 10 June | 963 | 181 | 393 | 220 | 33 | 143 | 7 |
9 July | 972 | 126 | 584 | 357 | 96 | 169 | 6 |
ªFerulic acid equivalents/kg dry matter
In-vitro digestibility and extent of degradation in different plant parts averaged across sampling dates is presented below. In general digestibility was highest at the first sampling date (May) and tended to decrease with later sampling dates [5].
Plant part | Apparent in-vitro digestibility (g/g dry matter) |
True in-vitro digestibility (g/g dry matter) |
Extent of degradation (g/g dry matter) |
Leaves | 0.825 | 0.873 | 0.541 |
Stems | 0.699 | 0.757 | 0.396 |
Flowers | 0.872 | 0.923 | 0.625 |
Fruit | 0.584 | 0.685 | 0.386 |
Cover value: No information is available on this topic.
Habit: Shrub
More info for the terms: adventitious, ground residual colonizer, shrub
POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY [123]:
Small shrub, adventitious bud/root crown
Ground residual colonizer (on-site, initial community)
Cytisus scoparius has been planted for a variety of reasons including livestock forage, erosion control, and as a landscape ornamental. Its dried twigs can be tied together to make brooms, providing its common name, Scotch Broom. It has also been used medically as a diuretic, and to treat hemophelia and arthritis (NMCD, 2009). Broom contains alkaloid compounds and can be toxic. It is also used in basketmaking, for thatching materials, and as a source of fiber (ILDIS 2005).
Forest plantations and degraded forest areas